If anyone has seen the news lately you'll be familiar with the conflict and tensions in the Korean peninsula. Lately the tensions in the Demilitarized zone have created a lot of international media attention. If anyone were to suggest a solution to creating some stability in the region one might suggest in intervention from the United Nations.
But what would the answer to stabilizing the tension between North Korea and it's counter part in the South, in order to avoid a potential risk of war, the answer could lie in the United Nations imposing tougher military sanctions toward's North Korea's military and missile program's. But just what will the implication's of these sanction be?
This argument will discuss whether the United Nation's should impose tougher military sanction's on North Korea in order to restore some stability in the region, which I oppose. Most importantly it will outline implications which could arise, such as the threat of continual conflict in the region due to the "threats" of Korea's missile program.
It will also discuss the effects that these sanction's could have on humanitarian aid and economic aid to North Korea. Finally, the long term implication's that these sanction's could have on potential peace talks between neighboring countries. These points all support my argument opposing sanctions from the United Nations.


Hi Rose
ReplyDeleteI agree with you imposing tougher military action is going to harm more then it will help to bring stability , there so many other countries we can use an example of imposing tougher military which going wrong , it seems only the innocent people get to pay the price , hopefully they will find a better solution